Showing posts with label PIRLS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label PIRLS. Show all posts

Monday, August 11, 2008

Stephen Krashen ... Do Libraries Matter?

Day 4: Keynote speaker Stephen Krashen and more ...



In her introduction, Blanche Woolls noted Stephen Krashen's significant finding that "children are more likely to read if they have something to read." Dr Krashen spoke to an appreciative audience and it was delightful to find he is something of a comedian -- as well as a man I could admire for his clarity on the subject of reading. He began, there are three things that keep the mind supple: bilingualism, reading, and coffee! We were fortunate that coffee was being served, I thought.



Krashen thought his talk should be entitled, "How Libraries Can End All Literacy Issues Forever." The most powerful tool in the literacy kit, supported by consistent research, is free voluntary reading. He referenced his study against other signficant milestones in understanding the power of reading. Daniel Fader's Hooked on Books revolutionized how educators delivered reading programs in schools and school libraries as Dr. Fader successfully demonstrated that his study of underprivileged boys given books and freed from writing reports or paying fines were better at everything -- simply be administering "books" and time for independent reading.


He referred to the 1983 work of Elley and Manghubai, "The effect of reading on second language learning" published in Reading Research Quarterly (19/1, 53-67) now known as the Fiji "Book Flood" project. Students in grades 4 and 5 were immersed in regular reading of English materials as part of their second language learning experience. This not only accelerated the development of their second language proficiency in reading and listening, but had consistent and positive effects on their proficiency in their own language as well.


The "book flood" project was replicated in 1985 in Singapore with a larger number of younger children; the results were consistent with the earlier findings: children in the study group did better than those taught by traditional methods on tests of reading comprehension, vocabulary, oral language, grammar, listening comprehension and writing. Elley noted that children exposed to a broad choice of high-interest illustrated story books, encouraged to read and share them, will learn a new language more quickly but there will also be improved competence in other language skills such as writing and control over syntax. That is, all language skills are improved by reading as opposed to learning the language from textbooks with reading programs. Additionally students do better on tests when they read, through acquisition, than when they are taught for testing. Or, literacy and language development should be pleasurable experiences, not painful ones.


Krashen then considered programs such as Accelerated Reader which put books, time to read, tests and quizzes of literal understandings together with prizes. Conservatively, he suggested, there needs to be a definitive study; but one might also conjecture that such programs are, in fact, harmful because they offer extrinsic rewards for something intrinsically pleasurable. Alfie Kohn offers this same point in his book Punish by Rewards: payment for something you like to do can "extinguish the behaviour."


Another significant study was a longitudinal one by Greaney and Clarke (1973) which showed that boys who engaged in sustained silent free reading in school continued to be readers as adults.


Krashen talked about the practice of reading aloud with children. Jim Trelease, in his book The Read-Aloud Handbook (2006, Penguin), observes the importance of what he calls the "home-run" books, the books that make a difference in a child's life with reading, be that Captain Underpants or Garfield. These are the keys into literature, into fictional expressions that portray life experiences, ethics, and more. Frank Smith adds that children read more in quiet comfortable places with lots of books, that they get the "feel" for stories from read-alouds like Charlotte's Web and Judy Blume.


It is Krashen's view that school libraries are the hottest area in language and literacy education. The better the school library, the higher the reading scores. This view is supported by the research of Lance and Loertscher and by the work of Jeff McQuillan, in his book The Literacy Crisis: False Claims, Real Solutions (Heinemann, 1998) which used data from the NAEP (National Assessment of Educational Progress). Unlike standardized testing, the NAEP is zero-stakes and uses only a sampling of students. Controlling for poverty, McQuillan found there were better results with better access to libraries. There is a strong correlation between access to print materials and reading scores, supporting the case for strong, well-stocked libraries.


These results are replicated in a study of 2007 NAEP scores. Researchers undertook to assess the impact of access to books on two groups of children equally poor. The one with . access to books will do better. They assessed predictors of improvement by grade 8 and found the single factor was access to books.


The PIRLS (Progress in International Reading Literacy Study) provides plentiful data about the students who take the test in 40 different countries. Again data indicates reading instruction is negative and the effect of poverty is overwhelming. There is more likelihood that children in high income neighbourhoods will have a qualified teacher-librarian, access to materials, reading services, and bookstores. Barbara Heyns shows that high and low income children show the same gains throughout the school year. The difference is made in summer reading where students of higher socio-economic status are closer to the library. Summer reading programs provide opportunities for two hours of reading a day, 30 minutes a day for browsing, and time for talking about what is being read. The single most popular author for young readers? R L Stine!


What, says Krashen metaphorically, if there was a country experiencing a drought and famine, and the experts deemed that the children there needed painful and expensive surgery? Everyone would say, no, feed them!

Or, as I have often said, reading improves with reading! Motivated and enthusiastic readers will 'stretch' to read at higher levels ... we have only to look at the impact of Harry Potter to know that to be true. Wow! I can't believe that I began teaching in the days when Hooked on Books was what we knew to be true -- just how and why have we been led so far astray, and at what costs to school libraries and our students as readers today and in their adult lives? The conference continued to astound and challenge: yes, you've got it -- oh my, oh my, oh my!


Stephen's book The Power of Reading in Japanese (7th edition) was presented in appreciation of his work.

Wednesday, April 16, 2008

Best Practice: Literacy and School Libraries



The Critical Perception:

What Does Literacy Look Like?

Have you notice the fade-out of media focus on problems for most BC children with literacy. Instead the focus is on the issues of low literacy skills for the 40+ group, as well as some identified groups within communities.

Did you see how well young adolescent British Columbians did on the OECD international tests of 15-year olds, the PISA rsults? If we are in the top group globally, along with the Scandinavian countries who don't impose standardized testing on their young people, is it possible we are already the most literate jurisdiction (for young people) in North America?

Our system does some things right and is a model for other jurisdictions in North America, not the other way around. The issues in Canadian education are too often, as John Ralston Saul points out, "imported crises." If you attended the BCTLA Conference this year, you would have heard David Bouchard state the same thing.

I found it interesting that also doing well, alongside the young British Columbians, are young Albertans who are educated in a province where there are very few school libraries with qualified teacher-librarians. Is it possible -- dare I ask? -- that school libraries in Western Canada do not have an integral role to play in creating a learning environment for success in reading and writing. I have wondered.

When I asked her recently, Susan Lambert, 1st VP, BCTF, (and prior to that, a teacher-librarian) indicated that Federation researchers asked the same question and found quite simply that:

(1) Alberta does not have the same diversity in its population,

(2) Alberta does not have the same disparity in its population, and

(3) the Alberta curriculum is closely tied to the OECD testing!

For more information, here's

  • Wikipedia on the subject of the PISA and PIRLS.
  • IRA article "PISA, PIRLS spotlight global trends" includes information about where school libraries are located and "the analysis of the PISA results [which has provided] three very interesting insights on the impacts of curriculum reform on equity.
  • The standard deviations give us some evidence of the “tops” and “tails” of achievement, with some systems having extremely large differentials between their best and worst achievers.
  • PISA allows the disaggregated analysis of results for migrants and indigenous groups, indicating that some systems (e.g., Canada and Australia) do an excellent job of bootstrapping migrant and second-language performance.
  • Most important, PISA provides important data on the relative impacts of socioeconomic background on achievement. The results indicate that systems
    needn’t trade off “quality” for “equity.” In fact, many systems, including
    Finland and Canada, are “high quality/high equity.”
  • The BCTF report on the 2006 PISA testing, released in December 2007, for achievement in young British Columbians.
  • The full PIRLS 2006 report, downloadable by chapter, including the Executive Report.

Describe how literacy looks in your library:

We can continue to take comfort in knowing that the research that connects higher achievement in schools to the presence of a qualified TL and a well-resourced school library collections -- in short, a system that values the place of school libraries in the formula for achievement and success in learning-- seems to apply to the BC education system.

When we work to put just the right book or resource into the hands of just the right child at just the right moment ... whether that is because the child is looking for something to read for enjoyment or to use for information to undertake research -- we all know the feeling of accomplishment as the child expresses gratitude or when the child returns to say, "Find me another book like the last one, please -- you know what I like!" When we work with students to draw out and apply their background knowledge, or we show them how to take notes or how to preview the text to understand its structures and organization or how to work with keywords for research or how to find a key term in the index or glossary of a book or how to build search strings that incorporate Boolean logic or how to read the address of a google-based source for credibility and/or reliability ... these recurring literacy practices that denote the work of a teacher-librarian can be generalized to describe "best practice" in libraries for literacy development.

You have received a survey that will be important in beginning to describe how Literacy works in school libraries and when TLs work with students and colleagues to promote goals for literacy development. What are the best literacy practices we can describe in school libraries here in Vancouver? Let's tell the District and the Ministry how we do it.

Have a great week, and thanks for help with the informal survey you received in your email this week above.


Some quotes for your consideration:


"What a school thinks about its library is a measure of what it thinks about education."

~ Harold Howe, former U.S. Commissioner of Education


"I don't water rocks."


Pat P found this quote noteworthy; a Google search indicates what might be the source, the recorded response of an unidentified school district ICT co-ordinator who was the subject of a study of technology integration, speaking about "laggard teachers," those who were reluctant to embrace technology innovation! It was recorded in a 2003 Australian PhD thesis study: "Integration or Transformation: A Cross-national Study of Information and Communication Technology in School Education" by Andrew E. Fluck. No rocks here in our libraries, though!